Re: [PATCH] Revert "batman-adv: prefer kfree_rcu() over call_rcu() with free-only callbacks"

[Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]

On Wednesday, 12 June 2024 18:31:57 CEST Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:06:25AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > We are looking into nice ways of solving this, but in the meantime,
> > yes, if you are RCU-freeing slab objects into a slab that is destroyed
> > at module-unload time, you currently need to stick with call_rcu()
> > and rcu_barrier().
> >
> > We do have some potential solutions to allow use of kfree_rcu() with
> > this sort of slab, but they are still strictly potential.
> >
> > Apologies for my having failed to foresee this particular trap!
> 
> No worries, thanks for the help and clarification! This at least
> restored my sanity, was starting to doubt my understanding of RCU
> and the batman-adv code the longer I tried to find the issue in
> batman-adv :D.

Thanks Linus and Paul. I've queued up the revert. But feel free to submit a 
version with updated text in case you want to incorporate information from 
this thread.

Kind regards,
	Sven

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]