All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Mader <Wolfgang_Mader@brain-frog.de>
To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Likelihood of read error, recover device failure raid10
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:39:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2336793.AMaAIAxWk4@discus> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]

Hi,

I have two questions

1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
btrfs pools all devices and than stripes and mirrors across this pool. Is it 
therefore correct, that a raid10 layout consisting of 4 devices a,b,c,d is 
_not_

              raid0
       |---------------|
------------      -------------
|a|  |b|      |c|  |d|
   raid1            raid1

Rather, there is no clear distinction of device level between two devices 
which form a raid1 set which are than paired by raid0, but simply, each bit is 
mirrored across two different devices. Is this correct?

2) Recover raid10 from a failed disk
Raid10 inherits its redundancy from the raid1 scheme. If I build a raid10 from 
n devices, each bit is mirrored across two devices. Therefore, in order to 
restore a raid10 from a single failed device, I need to read the amount of 
data worth this device from the remaining n-1 devices. In case, the amount of 
data on the failed disk is in the order of the number of bits for which I can 
expect an unrecoverable read error from a device, I will most likely not be 
able to recover from the disk failure. Is this conclusion correct, or am I am 
missing something here.

Thanks,
Wolfgang

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-13 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-13 15:39 Wolfgang Mader [this message]
2016-08-13 20:15 ` Likelihood of read error, recover device failure raid10 Hugo Mills
2016-08-14  1:07 ` Duncan
2016-08-14 16:20 ` Chris Murphy
2016-08-14 18:04   ` Wolfgang Mader
2016-08-15  4:21     ` Wolfgang Mader
2016-08-15  3:46   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-08-15  5:51   ` Andrei Borzenkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2336793.AMaAIAxWk4@discus \
    --to=wolfgang_mader@brain-frog.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.