Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] dts: add crypto test decorator

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

12/03/2026 19:48, Andrew Bailey:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 
> > That's a bit strange to read,
> > because a crypto test can be functional or performance.
> > I suppose we can re-discuss the classification of the tests.
> > If the only need here is about the traffic generator,
> > we could make it "raw input" or something like that?
> >
> 
> I agree that "crypto" is not exactly a true description of the
> purpose for this test type. It is probably better for the test type
> to explicitly describe it's purpose. maybe NO_GEN/NO_GENERATOR
> or NO_TG. It just so happens with this series that crypto tests are the
> only cases with this type, which was the cause for the initial name
> but should change in the future. Furthermore, we could divide this
> into performance and functional versions of this flag.

Yes I think we need to consider the level of abstraction required here,
and the cases we want to cover.