From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iVEKM-00038S-Vj for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:34:24 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:03:59 +0530 From: Sathishkumar Muruganandam Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] add Wide Band Scan support In-Reply-To: References: <1572869374-9635-1-git-send-email-murugana@codeaurora.org> <53d45563803b3f96be0d53731408cc3af028c510.camel@sipsolutions.net> <00d301d593c2$bd37d8f0$37a78ad0$@codeaurora.org> <867302d58d3183ce7e2c7afa846027a787579b87.camel@sipsolutions.net> <6ea305b2ac09c340181623a23cf4180b@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <2354c9e9f86b2207d6828b45e4055191@codeaurora.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org On 2019-11-14 12:08, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 13:27 +0530, Sathishkumar Muruganandam wrote: >> >> > How is this related to scanning? It sounds to me like you're just >> > (ab)using scan as a somewhat convenient "do some channel hopping" API >> > ... >> > >> >> Whether this can be used under "iw offchannel" with >> NL80211_CMD_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL? > > Are you asking if I would accept wide > channel extensions to R-O-C? Yes, adding bandwidth config to existing command. Something like this, iw offchannel [HT40+|HT40-|80MHz] > Still I guess I'd like to see an actual reason for it. Wide band scan is actually moving to a off-channel for a specified duration to capture 40, 80Mhz data frames. So, I hope offchannel would accommodate this extension. -- Thanks, Sathishkumar _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53089C43215 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233DE20709 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="Qu5MRpMz"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="PZEh8FFd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726214AbfKNMef (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:34:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49468 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726142AbfKNMef (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:34:35 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A53F260A74; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:34:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573734874; bh=dwYCGAKBSoFqxbMRFaDIWTlRC6an4vrFsFQjVt+pXWk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Qu5MRpMzrSKnIA3koJrLhR4VunthFjKQyLn3sbftv8cUIKO6R5EB1qs/yb2k8Lc2y EwfQKRFhMjuSHXTDLOv77etnG1sMYzUc88BAjB0iGQ4EEA/KyF25/fPKdKAqG2FQSx p4TUpeBMV5OxY7P15VzJa9GM4j6DbmHTWzvm/FG8= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF798601C4; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:33:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573734840; bh=dwYCGAKBSoFqxbMRFaDIWTlRC6an4vrFsFQjVt+pXWk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PZEh8FFdOFcz8cQ1cIQiyf4EmwRGrHw+sYkGjPdtff/Di/7vVbO61OktpQYQX5tkI qYn4S3Ldlk+PBPgkQ3CBaq23noyUwFhFI0zbB8BeDa1R3ICWyIilACAlNuCv+1I++p zGJcpqImK1dTGqJS5iQIJghUW1A44QCghbRKP5Tc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:03:59 +0530 From: Sathishkumar Muruganandam To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] add Wide Band Scan support In-Reply-To: References: <1572869374-9635-1-git-send-email-murugana@codeaurora.org> <53d45563803b3f96be0d53731408cc3af028c510.camel@sipsolutions.net> <00d301d593c2$bd37d8f0$37a78ad0$@codeaurora.org> <867302d58d3183ce7e2c7afa846027a787579b87.camel@sipsolutions.net> <6ea305b2ac09c340181623a23cf4180b@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <2354c9e9f86b2207d6828b45e4055191@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: murugana@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2019-11-14 12:08, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 13:27 +0530, Sathishkumar Muruganandam wrote: >> >> > How is this related to scanning? It sounds to me like you're just >> > (ab)using scan as a somewhat convenient "do some channel hopping" API >> > ... >> > >> >> Whether this can be used under "iw offchannel" with >> NL80211_CMD_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL? > > Are you asking if I would accept wide > channel extensions to R-O-C? Yes, adding bandwidth config to existing command. Something like this, iw offchannel [HT40+|HT40-|80MHz] > Still I guess I'd like to see an actual reason for it. Wide band scan is actually moving to a off-channel for a specified duration to capture 40, 80Mhz data frames. So, I hope offchannel would accommodate this extension. -- Thanks, Sathishkumar