From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:10:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23572.1270804211@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270792042-9358-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> +#define rcu_access_pointer(p) ((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
> ...
> +#define rcu_access_pointer(p) ((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
There's no difference between your two versions of rcu_access_pointer(), so
you could move that whole construct outside of the #ifdef'ed section.
Other than that:
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 5:47 [PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: updates for RCU lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 9:10 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-04-09 9:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-09 16:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-12 19:24 ` Josh Triplett
2010-04-12 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-12 20:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/4] RCU: Better explain the condition parameter of rcu_dereference_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 9:11 ` David Howells
2010-04-09 5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/4] rcu: Update docs for rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 9:16 ` David Howells
2010-04-09 5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/4] rcu: fix syntax error in rcu_dereference_check() example in comment Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 9:17 ` David Howells
2010-04-09 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 8:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: updates for RCU lockdep Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-09 22:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent] v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 22:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/3] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-10 6:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-10 8:13 ` David Howells
2010-04-14 15:00 ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Add " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 22:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/3] RCU: Better explain the condition parameter of rcu_dereference_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 15:01 ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: " tip-bot for David Howells
2010-04-09 22:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/3] rcu: Update docs for rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 15:01 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23572.1270804211@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.