All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kill ptrace_{get,put}_breakpoints()
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:06:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23596.1366157217@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130416134913.GC9189@redhat.com>

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/16, Michael Neuling wrote:
> >
> > > Benjamin, Paul, arch_dup_task_struct()->flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(src)
> > > on powerpc looks "obviously wrong". Don't we need
> > >
> > > 	- flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(src);
> > > 	+ dst->thread->ptrace_bps[0] = NULL;
> >
> > Do you mean the following?
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> > index 59dd545..559804e 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct tas
> >         flush_vsx_to_thread(src);
> >         flush_spe_to_thread(src);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> > -       flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(src);
> > +       dst->thread.ptrace_bps[0] = NULL;
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
> 
> Almost.
> 
> This is what I think we should do, but it is pointless to do this
> in arch_dup_task_struct(), setup_thread_stack() will copy ptrace_bps[]
> from parent later.
> 
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00100108
> > Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000014d5e4
> > cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c00000007e5836a0]
> >     pc: c00000000014d5e4: .toggle_bp_slot+0x74/0x1c0
> >     lr: c00000000014dc14: .release_bp_slot+0x44/0x70
> >     sp: c00000007e583920
> >    msr: 9000000000009032
> >    dar: 100108
> >  dsisr: 42000000
> >   current = 0xc00000007e560000
> >   paca    = 0xc00000000fe00000	 softe: 0	 irq_happened: 0x08
> >     pid   = 1, comm = init
> > enter ? for help
> > [c00000007e5839d0] c00000000014dc14 .release_bp_slot+0x44/0x70
> > [c00000007e583a50] c000000000144bbc .free_event+0x6c/0x1e0
> > [c00000007e583ad0] c000000000144dc4 .perf_event_release_kernel+0x94/0x110
> > [c00000007e583b60] c00000000014cf08 .unregister_hw_breakpoint+0x18/0x30
> > [c00000007e583bd0] c00000000000e5f8 .ptrace_set_debugreg+0x158/0x230
> > [c00000007e583cd0] c00000000000eb4c .arch_ptrace+0x43c/0x7b0
> > [c00000007e583d90] c00000000008cbf8 .SyS_ptrace+0x98/0x170
> > [c00000007e583e30] c000000000009d54 syscall_exit+0x0/0x98
> > --- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 000000001001d1d4
> > SP (3fffdf7459f0) is in userspace
> >
> > The crash seems to happen some time after the fork.  Might be when the
> > new processes exits or get another ptrace call on it (I'm not sure which
> > one sorry).
> 
> Yes, probably because both parent and child have the same ->ptrace_bps[]
> pointers.
> 
> > Without your suggestion it doesn't crash this case (ie. mainline passes).
> 
> This is clear. flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() nullifies ->ptrace_bps[], so
> setup_thread_stack() copies NULL.
> 
> But, unless I missed something, this is wrong. Why should the parent lose
> its bps after fork?

Agreed, it shouldn't lose it.

> IOW, I think we need something like the patch below, but I do not have
> a powerpc machine for the testing.

OK, the below works for me... no more crashing.  FWIW

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>

Thanks,
Mikey

> 
> > Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> [PATCH] ptrace/powerpc: dont flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() on fork()
> 
> arch_dup_task_struct() does flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(src), this
> is not what we want. We should clear child->thread.ptrace_bps[]
> copied by dup_task_struct().
> 
> --- x/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ x/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -910,10 +910,6 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_str
>  	flush_altivec_to_thread(src);
>  	flush_vsx_to_thread(src);
>  	flush_spe_to_thread(src);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> -	flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(src);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
> -
>  	*dst = *src;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -984,6 +980,10 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flag
>  	p->thread.ksp_limit = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(p) +
>  				_ALIGN_UP(sizeof(struct thread_info), 16);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> +	p->thread.ptrace_bps[0] = NULL;
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64
>  	if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_SLB)) {
>  		unsigned long sp_vsid;
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-17  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-14 16:05 [PATCH 0/5] kill ptrace_{get,put}_breakpoints() Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-14 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace/x86: Revert "hw_breakpoints: Fix racy access to ptrace breakpoints" Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-15  9:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-15 22:55   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-14 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] ptrace/powerpc: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-14 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] ptrace/arm: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-16  8:46   ` Will Deacon
2013-04-14 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] ptrace/sh: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-14 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: Revert "Prepare to fix racy accesses on task breakpoints" Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-15 22:59   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-16  7:22 ` [PATCH 0/5] kill ptrace_{get,put}_breakpoints() Michael Neuling
2013-04-16 13:49   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-17  0:06     ` Michael Neuling [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23596.1366157217@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.