From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dvalin.narfation.org (dvalin.narfation.org [213.160.73.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9602617D6; Sat, 27 Jun 2026 07:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.160.73.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782544073; cv=none; b=bRXnYg/Vtl+7usdu/WesRlj7YaS0zTJIkbVTOfiZOaG6lJYHYRkqHunIQZ+9sRfrtN1PmpzmXcff7BoTZocvfU/Fb1Oio4XCDX3rRQxWeB+0V6TgMbTW0NyFkZ+1sqc5MBGJ2MWz8sHSdBw1WUFxHuhoJCROklvJ9TIaibM8/7M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782544073; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tn4s73pHxp4rEwFZwUjfRqZCNaTlu+S3OPocY77PtJo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MY2bx+VjDwWBGUF5sQG4/q92D8NDNv60CdZ0cKogXqkfJ4Sp5JX+0hCunBfwTNRMCx9nnhytJMlDrtyziSkC6mZ8pWLZ0GD9tJmyTuxr+hSiRqRIgJmkgi6BUN8eApS6f0PiVPG/OooFK/bkXqKhmO2amCEjKaosTQnXYV3IukI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=narfation.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=narfation.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=narfation.org header.i=@narfation.org header.b=xU/S7FRM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.160.73.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=narfation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=narfation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=narfation.org header.i=@narfation.org header.b="xU/S7FRM" Received: by dvalin.narfation.org (Postfix) id E83341FECA; Sat, 27 Jun 2026 07:07:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narfation.org; s=20121; t=1782544070; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rNYYePDvpTYtK8SFepELEAwsSYVLkoYEB6ceWPvctuU=; b=xU/S7FRMIcBIxxOSODQ+3Ef91zyv84NTqUiec1VYqN2+CMkERDDQoGi3WYivN99W7HRPZN QxkhFp+L6S3pvtsxyM+xpNfo//17XYVPSjnjtPJzJa4FH1Vu3gNqTMsHoTcr66z8/4cG2w saVkbm+DCyQhztbSbUTvrOschb/O79o= From: Sven Eckelmann To: WenTao Liang Cc: marek.lindner@mailbox.org, sw@simonwunderlich.de, antonio@mandelbit.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix: net/batman-adv: batadv_interface_kill_vid: extra batadv_meshif_vlan_put after destroy Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <2365693.iZASKD2KPV@sven-desktop> In-Reply-To: <178254092045.4739.1497464106445743950.b4-review@b4> References: <20260627034636.59693-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> <178254092045.4739.1497464106445743950.b4-review@b4> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2053576.PYKUYFuaPT"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart2053576.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sven Eckelmann To: WenTao Liang Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <2365693.iZASKD2KPV@sven-desktop> In-Reply-To: <178254092045.4739.1497464106445743950.b4-review@b4> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Saturday, 27 June 2026 08:15:20 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:46:36 +0800, WenTao Liang wrote: > > Hi, > > not-acked Just noticed that we already have another odd patch from you [1] (and you never answered after my reply). Could it be that you just try to spread AI/ LLM(?) generated patches in stable@vger.kernel.org and hope that something sticks? I see a lot more patch bombs and complains all over the place when searching the whole lore.kernel.org [2] and only checking the last couple of days. If this is really the case - please don't do this. We already stress them (and other maintainers) enough by dumping large amounts of legitimate patches on them. Sending patches shutgun-style all over the place without any recognizable QA or oversight might just cause an overload. And when you then don't even take the time to react to the review of the patches or apply the requests they had to you (and instead invent new things to annoy them)... At least I will not spend an hour writing a reply to you anymore but directly reject your patch. Regards, Sven [1] https://lore.kernel.org/batman/20250401083901.2261-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=vulab@iscas.ac.cn --nextPart2053576.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQS81G/PswftH/OW8cVND3cr0xT1ywUCaj92vwAKCRBND3cr0xT1 y5/WAP92yVp2I7/TSTgNIsYCekkMLPcxg+GxSX4T1259xtOaYQEA21CF2Gh1h5bk Y9GzKjpEPYKSTb7JCwzHtF70D6c4WAk= =hJlZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2053576.PYKUYFuaPT--