From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, xuan.ding@intel.com, xiuchun.lu@intel.com,
cunming.liang@intel.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
david.marchand@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
matan@nvidia.com, Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v1 0/2] Add device emulation support in DPDK
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:10:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2372333.5epvb6RKAP@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200814191606.26312-1-chenbo.xia@intel.com>
14/08/2020 21:16, Chenbo Xia:
> Background & Motivation
> -----------------------
> In order to reduce the attack surface, QEMU community is disaggregating QEMU by
> removing part of device emulation from it. The disaggregated/multi-process QEMU
> is using VFIO-over-socket/vfio-user as the main transport mechanism to disaggregate
> I/O services from QEMU[2]. Vfio-user essentially implements the VFIO device model
> presented to the user process by a set of messages over a unix-domain socket. The
> main difference between application using vfio-user and application using vfio
> kernel module is that device manipulation is based on socket messages for vfio-user
> but system calls for vfio kernel module. The vfio-user devices consist of a generic
> VFIO device type, living in QEMU, which is called the client[3], and the core device
> implementation (emulated device), living outside of QEMU, which is called the server.
>
> With the introduction and support of vfio-user in QEMU, QEMU is explicitly adding
> support for external emulated device and data path. We are trying to leverage that
> and introducing vfio-user support in DPDK. By doing so, DPDK is enabled to be an
> alternative I/O device emulation library of building virtualized devices along with
> high-performance data path in separate processes outside QEMU. It will be easy for
> hardware vendors to provide virtualized solutions of their hardware devices by
> implementing emulated device in DPDK.
>
> Except for vfio-user introduced in DPDK, this series also introduces the first
> emulated device implementation. That is emulated AVF device (avf_emudev) implemented
> by AVF emulation driver (avf_emudev driver). Emulated AVF device demos how emulated
> device could be implemented in DPDK. SPDK is also investigating to implement use case
> for NVMe.
I am completely unaware of this change in QEMU.
I've found this presentation about Multi-process QEMU by Oracle:
https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kvmforum2019/d2/kvm-mpqemu.pdf
and there is the wiki page you already referenced:
https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/MultiProcessQEMU
I guess virtio stays inside QEMU?
What is really moving out? e1000, ne2000 and vmxnet3?
Why emulated AVF is needed, compared to a simple VFIO passthrough?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 19:16 [dpdk-dev] [RFC v1 0/2] Add device emulation support in DPDK Chenbo Xia
2020-08-14 15:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-17 2:58 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-08-14 19:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v1 1/2] vfio_user: Add library for vfio over socket Chenbo Xia
2020-08-14 19:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v1 2/2] emudev: Add library for emulated device Chenbo Xia
2020-09-02 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-09-03 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v1 0/2] Add device emulation support in DPDK Xia, Chenbo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2372333.5epvb6RKAP@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=amorenoz@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=xiuchun.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xuan.ding@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.