From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is
	missing tailqs
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:21:27 +0100
Message-ID: <2381267.oLnQdW0j6H@xps>
References: <03A7D9A58FAFB54FBB01FEE199D7308A0134B8EE1F@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Burdick, Cliff" <Cliff.Burdick@viasat.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441EE201
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:21:30 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <03A7D9A58FAFB54FBB01FEE199D7308A0134B8EE1F@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff:
> This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application linked against the same library.

The question is to know why you don't have the same constructors in primary and seconday?