From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:06:41 +0100 Message-ID: <2383099.4onlEHILsb@xps13> References: <1449028676-19232-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20151203105752.GA7864@bricha3-MOBL3> <1904583.t7IonTIn7B@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D7D8D86 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:07:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so17137212wme.1 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:07:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1904583.t7IonTIn7B@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon: > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > > > behaviours. > > > > > How compatible are we looking for here. The standard way of compiling up DPDK > > up till now has always been "make install T=$RTE_TARGET", but that seems to no > > longer work. > > > > bruce@silpixa00389037-Fedora:dpdk-clean$ echo $RTE_TARGET > > x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc > > > > bruce@silpixa00389037-Fedora:dpdk-clean$ make install T=$RTE_TARGET > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.vars.mk:58: /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/build/.config: No such file or directory > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.vars.mk:83: *** RTE_ARCH is not defined. Stop. > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:98: recipe for target 'install' failed > > make: *** [install] Error 2 > > > > When I look for backward compatibilty, this is the main thing I look for, as I'm > > not aware of anyone (on my team here at least!) who does a make config first etc. > > When developing, most people just do a "make install T=..."straight up. > > I agree. > And it works on my machine. > I'd like to understand what is the problem on yours. My bad. When deleting build/.config, the bug appears. I will fix it. Sorry for the inconvenience.