All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] __linux__ and cross-compile
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:15:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2385.1011543302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0201201611030.20948-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0201201611030.20948-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>


bunk@fs.tum.de said:
>  If your compiler is configured as a cross-compiler everything should
> work as expected. If you are trying to compile a Linux kernel with a
> gcc that is configured to build binaries for NetBSD this sounds evil. 

What if he's trying to build UML to run on NetBSD? What if the best QA'd 
cross-gcc he has available is a generic arm-elf-gcc and he doesn't want to 
rebuild and do a full test and release cycle on it just because a handful 
of the kernel header files assume __linux__ will be defined?

> I don't know (I never tried to compile a *BSD kernel).

If you don't know, who was it that typed 'This is definitely wrong' in your 
first mail? Your cat?

> But if yes please consider what the following parts of your patch change:
> -#ifndef __linux__ 
> +#ifndef __KERNEL__

Well, if he hadn't explicitly mentioned that he made header files which 
could be included by userspace use defined(__KERNEL__)||defined(__linux__)
then I'd understand what you meant. As it is, I don't. Please explain.

--
dwmw2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-01-20 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-20 13:59 [PATCH] __linux__ and cross-compile Momchil Velikov
2002-01-20 14:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-01-20 15:08   ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-20 15:17     ` Adrian Bunk
2002-01-20 16:04       ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-20 16:15       ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-01-20 16:29         ` Adrian Bunk
2002-01-20 16:37           ` David Woodhouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-22  7:43 Zwane Mwaikambo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2385.1011543302@redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=velco@fadata.bg \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.