From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A91E0044A for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2012 08:31:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="142863105" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.175]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2012 08:31:04 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: John Willis Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:31:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2402037.qbM01MX6gb@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.2.0-24-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <00b101cd3764$be9cd960$3bd68c20$@Distant-earth.com> References: <14387597.ECeojYX8cL@helios> <00b101cd3764$be9cd960$3bd68c20$@Distant-earth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [poky] RaspberryPi Layer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:31:06 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 21 May 2012 16:16:47 John Willis wrote: > > > For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't > > > have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky. > > > > OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as > > well, and they have instructions in the layer README which tell people > > the BBMASK they can use to fix it. Can we not do the same here? > > That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in the > Yocto environment. Well, IMHO it's suboptimal, but far less so than two separate competing layers that ultimately exist for the same purpose. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre