From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6A62EE014B9; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [134.134.136.100 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A57E00C5B; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2018 13:17:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,362,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="55463011" Received: from frangeul-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.252.50.39]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2018 13:17:01 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Konrad Scherer Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 22:16:55 +0200 Message-ID: <2410950.gK5fZyVSBj@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Intel Corporation In-Reply-To: References: <2274431.fXWzuTuIFg@localhost.localdomain> <14728108.V4DRTVBihh@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [layerindex-web] RFC: layer index docker fixes X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:17:06 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday, 16 July 2018 8:24:53 PM CEST Konrad Scherer wrote: > On 07/13/2018 03:29 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday, 12 July 2018 10:16:12 PM CEST you wrote: > >> I just noticed that the image doesn't contain git. Was this > >> deliberate or an oversight? > > > > Ah, no, it wasn't deliberate - perhaps it was there earlier with > > buildpack-deps? It doesn't appear that we ever explicitly had it in there. > > I've added it and pushed the branch again. > > I recently noticed that if gcc is removed in the 'apt-get purge' step, > the bitbake sanity checker will fail due to missing 'gcc' when doing a > layer update. Hmm, well that's a different problem - those sanity checks shouldn't be running. We don't need those tools since we're not building anything. I will have a look into this. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre