diff for duplicates of <2414716.nTJ39zAhgn@phil> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3ee13f1..e604484 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:43:19 schrieb Stephen Boyd: > On 08/24, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Heiko > > -> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: +> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > The structure is xin24m -> pll -> pll-mux (xin24m,pll,xin32k). The pll > > > does have an init callback to make sure the boot-selected frequency is > > > using the expected pll settings and resets the same frequency using @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:43:19 schrieb Stephen Boyd: > > > it will be fully initialized when the pll clock executes its init- > > > callback and possibly touches the pll-mux clock. > > > -> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> +> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> > > > --- > > > This only surfaced with the clk_core changes for 4.3, so should > > > probably just go on top. @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:43:19 schrieb Stephen Boyd: > > super great to get this landed somewhere so that we can boot linuxnext > > again. :) > > -> > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> +> > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> > > So I understand the fix, but how could it have ever possibly > worked flawlessly? clk_mux_get_parent() should have returned diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0a87002..c4b1503 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,22 +1,23 @@ "ref\07060610.CC2Q1RMG2L@phil\0" "ref\0CAD=FV=UG_QkU0W5tpb3Y7zxuq6X7dtQmC4m5_j9vMtJgjdiquQ@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020150824234319.GG14330@codeaurora.org\0" - "From\0Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" + "ref\020150824234319.GG14330-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: register pll mux before pll itself\0" "Date\0Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:53:15 +0200\0" - "To\0Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>\0" - "Cc\0Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>" - Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC... <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> - linux-clk@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC... <linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>" + Michael Turquette <mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> + Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> + linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> + " linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:43:19 schrieb Stephen Boyd:\n" "> On 08/24, Doug Anderson wrote:\n" "> > Heiko\n" "> > \n" - "> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:\n" + "> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" "> > > The structure is xin24m -> pll -> pll-mux (xin24m,pll,xin32k). The pll\n" "> > > does have an init callback to make sure the boot-selected frequency is\n" "> > > using the expected pll settings and resets the same frequency using\n" @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ "> > > it will be fully initialized when the pll clock executes its init-\n" "> > > callback and possibly touches the pll-mux clock.\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>\n" + "> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>\n" "> > > ---\n" "> > > This only surfaced with the clk_core changes for 4.3, so should\n" "> > > probably just go on top.\n" @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ "> > super great to get this landed somewhere so that we can boot linuxnext\n" "> > again. :)\n" "> > \n" - "> > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>\n" + "> > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>\n" "> \n" "> So I understand the fix, but how could it have ever possibly\n" "> worked flawlessly? clk_mux_get_parent() should have returned\n" @@ -69,4 +70,4 @@ "from a different settings-touple that what we have in the rate-table, so not \n" even all plls normally. -659906f3706a2935029e0745cbe634b5f7548cc95d7c2c9a01a0ccdf60025203 +a72d01514bedd7bbc52cff0edce875261257f19607ba04695ffb3282fd3f7972
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 0a87002..138323f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,10 @@ "ref\07060610.CC2Q1RMG2L@phil\0" "ref\0CAD=FV=UG_QkU0W5tpb3Y7zxuq6X7dtQmC4m5_j9vMtJgjdiquQ@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020150824234319.GG14330@codeaurora.org\0" - "From\0Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: register pll mux before pll itself\0" + "From\0heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] clk: rockchip: register pll mux before pll itself\0" "Date\0Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:53:15 +0200\0" - "To\0Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>\0" - "Cc\0Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>" - Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC... <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> - linux-clk@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:43:19 schrieb Stephen Boyd:\n" @@ -69,4 +64,4 @@ "from a different settings-touple that what we have in the rate-table, so not \n" even all plls normally. -659906f3706a2935029e0745cbe634b5f7548cc95d7c2c9a01a0ccdf60025203 +8027bc2ddc62d593dbffbd827d3be2ba28a3d7ca622d1d80c4b1d425809d195a
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.