From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932583AbbJ0Ojj (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:39:39 -0400 Received: from forward11h.cmail.yandex.net ([87.250.230.153]:60014 "EHLO forward11h.cmail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932502AbbJ0Ojh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:39:37 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 537 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:39:37 EDT From: Evgeniy Polyakov Envelope-From: drustafa@yandex.ru To: Jiri Kosina Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , GregKH In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: w1_process() is not freezable kthread MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <2428911445956236@web17h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:30:36 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi 26.10.2015, 08:53, "Jiri Kosina" : > From: Jiri Kosina > > w1_process() calls try_to_freeze(), but the thread doesn't mark itself > freezable through set_freezable(), so the try_to_freeze() call is useless. I believe it is better to mark it freezable, what do you think? Its task is useless if anyone else goes sleeping, it should freeze too.