From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F42C433E2 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C0220775 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=xenproject.org header.i=@xenproject.org header.b="ms/ma0h/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64C0220775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDrvN-0004Bf-MZ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:17:21 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDrvM-0004Ba-DV for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:17:20 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 4280d950-d7c0-46d3-9722-18c79cdc8af3 Received: from mail.xenproject.org (unknown [104.130.215.37]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4280d950-d7c0-46d3-9722-18c79cdc8af3; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:17:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=W+iPYjQgxqn7sZDY4p7M9qjh7XDcDfGLhI9U+6qIJkw=; b=ms/ma0h/wLD0W+t0dPkN3HtP40 K57iNQAgjnEG2sv+hdXlCNLAdmb0wYsKNj4P9pbu3JsQAe2v7Ziyj78peCWZ/+4YgJ8S9EJtYM7SN n/HGv3Ot3qeGuQLHpgnKv0lFD1dWZAITmoJbR4VKmRYrPaqyALs+CDRrYsrnsGTuTxa4=; Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDrvK-0005Rc-Rg for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:17:18 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mynotebook.example.org) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDrvK-0007cA-QW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:17:18 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1kDrvD-0005SS-FJ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:17:11 +0100 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24401.5895.115731.487189@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:17:11 +0100 To: Jan Beulich Cc: Costin Lupu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Wei Liu Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 153602: regressions - FAIL In-Reply-To: <1bdbf90f-2150-cb86-63a2-37e5148ec34e@suse.com> References: <1bdbf90f-2150-cb86-63a2-37e5148ec34e@suse.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 153602: regressions - FAIL"): > On 03.09.2020 12:24, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 153602 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153602/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 152877 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 152877 > > While at least the hypervisor logs don't provide clear indication > (and I don't know where else to look among the files osstest > provides) I can't help thinking that stubdom apparently > crashing is still fallout from the mini-os changes (and no-one > really looks to care). In particular I think that this I haven't looked at this in detail but I notice that I am having build failures. Prior to e013e8514389 "config: use mini-os master for unstable", the version of mini-os used for builds was controlled by xen.git's Config.mk. Since then it has been mini-os master. NB there is no push gate for mini-os. IIRC we discussed this at the time and it was thought that breakage due to mini-os would be unlikely. To unblock development in xen.git I suggest reverting the minios part of 165f3afbfc3d "Config.mk: Unnail versions (for unstable branch)", choosing some known-working version of minios to put in Config.mk. Perhaps there should indeed be a minios pushgate. Then osstest would use the tested version. Ian.