From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ03A-0007a9-3A for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:04:12 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2012 05:50:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,257,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="218192362" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.197]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2012 05:50:12 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:50:10 +0000 Message-ID: <2449434.J2bi9dLU3a@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1352975896-14628-1-git-send-email-b40290@freescale.com> References: <1352975896-14628-1-git-send-email-b40290@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: B29882@freescale.com, B19537@freescale.com Subject: Re: [meta-oe v4 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1 * There are difference spaces between inetutils-1.8/COPYING and inetutils-1.9.1/COPYING, so md5sum is changed.6 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:12 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 15 November 2012 18:38:16 Chunrong Guo wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo > --- Somehow the commit message got mangled here - could you please resend? Also, given you are going to be resending and the recipe is being moved to meta- networking can you use the prefix "meta-networking" instead of "meta-oe"? Thanks, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre