From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexander G. M. Smith" Subject: RE: ".meta." as a Name Prefix Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:18:36 -0400 EDT Message-ID: <2452111248-BeMail@cr593174-a> References: <3DF9165145FACB4C96977FF650C1E9040C469E75@its-mail1.its.corp.gwl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3DF9165145FACB4C96977FF650C1E9040C469E75@its-mail1.its.corp.gwl.com> List-Id: To: "Burnes, James" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Burnes, James wrote on Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:10:00 -0600: > In the same way that 'ls ' is ambigous. Does it mean I want > to look at the attributes of the directory itself, or does it mean that > I'm referring to the contents of the directory? That's why they > invented 'ls -d' Good analog. There would have to be some OS and application level changes to support having both read/writeable data and child objects. For backwards compatiblity, calling ReadDir() would likely hint that you want a list of child objects, and read() means you want the data. The feature I want is that you can do both to any file system object. Plus of course indexing of attributes and other BeOS style goodies. - Alex