From: Andrey Volkov <avolkov@varma-el.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:19 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060410163800.B753735260B@atlas.denx.de>
On Monday, April 10, 2006, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Andrey,
> in message <1618325846.20060410201725@varma-el.com> you wrote:
>>
>> > This does not mean anything. I haven't seen a single case where the
>> > network speed was the limiting factor. Shuffeling the data through
>> > the JTAG is usually much slower.
>> Not always. As ex.: allowable MPC5200 JTAG's clock is ... 25 MHz,
>> clock of 10 Mbit eth is ... + tcp stack overhead. And now we run
>> memory dump command and measure.
> But the 25 MHz also includes a LOT of JTAG communication overhead. I
> think you won't get even close to a raw 10 Mbps data rate, but I have
> to admit that I never actually measured it yet. Did you really
> measure this? For example, what difference do you get when you
> connect your Lauterbach to a 10 Mbps port vs. a 100 Mbps port?
> [This is a serious question; I have never been able to run such a
> test myself yet.]
Unfortunately, but I have not access to a Lauterbach anymore (as I say,
I work with it 3 years ago), so I couldn't run this test too :(.
snip..
--
Regards,
Andrey Volkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04 ` Andrey Volkov [this message]
2006-04-11 6:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12 7:54 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13 6:17 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13 6:43 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20 ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04 ` Andrey Volkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com \
--to=avolkov@varma-el.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.