From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1696DC433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3B764E08 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C3B764E08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.79940.145813 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ag1-0002WR-4Z; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:41 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 79940.145813; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ag1-0002WK-1Y; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:41 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 79940; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:40 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ag0-0002WA-33 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:40 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ag0-00046x-2G for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:40 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ag0-0003Wo-1N for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:40 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1l6afv-0007gD-Cb; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:59:35 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=B5q6o1TGLLRrNrSxomCbQfBR0hkmteq+1huEep3awn4=; b=3lUNaioN/e5TsKwcIoRWgoTuoQ 7aBvh8xqoaf3C2geRO/EywgKckWAkCrJn+yTgW9+mjhuQZZe00lLnaCi3t8yDa/jF4A9Kw8cGP9kt 673cszVZaIz0k1vzayM6rWM0GsQZGWkzYwbE83NiiUfz+yUj8+4UHAbfo4fW18GIynUc=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <24600.5975.179890.232213@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:35 +0000 To: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Cc: Manuel Bouyer , , Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Document qemu-ifup on NetBSD In-Reply-To: References: <20210130230300.11664-1-bouyer@netbsd.org> <20210130230300.11664-2-bouyer@netbsd.org> <20210201093747.GA624@antioche.eu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Document qemu-ifup on NetBSD"): > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:37:47AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > Well, as a user, I want to know how the scripts are called, so that I can > > tune them ... > > Isn't that information on the header of the script? I would expect > users that want to modify such script will open it and then the header > should already lists the parameters. > > IMO I would leave the parameters out of this document because we don't > list them for any other script, so it seems odd to list them for the > qemu-ifup script only. I think it is shown there, indeed. That may not be the best place for this information. But maybe putting it somewhere else should be done systematically rather than ad hoc. IOW with my maintainer hat on I don't feel I have a strong opinion. OTOH from my RM hat Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson since this is a documentation change. Ian.