From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Phil Sutter <psutter@redhat.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:43:02 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25145358.1155254.1503499382947.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1907606232.1152250.1503498773672.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Hi,
In 9dbbfb0ab6680c6a85609041011484e6658e7d3c function tipc_sk_reinit
had additional logic added to loop in the event that function
rhashtable_walk_next() returned -EAGAIN. No worries.
However, if rhashtable_walk_start returns -EAGAIN, it does "continue",
and therefore skips the call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). That has
the effect of calling rcu_read_lock() without its paired call to
rcu_read_unlock(). Since rcu_read_lock() may be nested, the problem
may not be apparent for a while, especially since resize events may
be rare. But the comments to rhashtable_walk_start() state:
* ...Note that we take the RCU lock in all
* cases including when we return an error. So you must always call
* rhashtable_walk_stop to clean up.
This patch replaces the continue with a goto and label to ensure a
matching call to rhashtable_walk_stop().
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
index 101e3597338f..d50edd6e0019 100644
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -2255,8 +2255,8 @@ void tipc_sk_reinit(struct net *net)
do {
tsk = ERR_PTR(rhashtable_walk_start(&iter));
- if (tsk)
- continue;
+ if (IS_ERR(tsk))
+ goto walk_stop;
while ((tsk = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter)) && !IS_ERR(tsk)) {
spin_lock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ void tipc_sk_reinit(struct net *net)
msg_set_orignode(msg, tn->own_addr);
spin_unlock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
}
-
+walk_stop:
rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);
} while (tsk == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
}
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1907606232.1152250.1503498773672.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2017-08-23 14:43 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2017-08-24 13:10 ` [PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN Herbert Xu
2017-08-24 21:02 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25145358.1155254.1503499382947.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psutter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.