From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:48857 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751623AbdG2UFl (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:05:41 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Simon Horman Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux-Renesas Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: Remove extra LVDS port label Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:05:50 +0300 Message-ID: <2519562.g0Iit6Qbpy@avalon> In-Reply-To: References: <20170713121714.30789-1-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Simon, On Monday 17 Jul 2017 10:07:33 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > The DU LVDS output is on port 3 on R8A7795 but on port 2 on R8A7796. The > > lvds_connector label thus can't be defined in salvator-common.dtsi, > > common to the two SoCs. > > > > The lvds_connector label is meant for convience to be referenced from > > panel device tree files, such as r8a77xx-aa104xd12-panel.dtsi or > > r8a77xx-aa121td01-panel.dtsi. As those files are not included in any > > device tree source, and the label never used elsewhere, we can simply > > remove it. Out-of-tree patches that include panel device tree files can > > then add a > > > > #define lvds_connector du_out_lvds0 > > > > before including the panel device tree file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Could you please pick this patch up for v4.14 ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart