From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJPz6-0006WZ-Jp for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:31:36 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2012 07:18:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,528,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="201071717" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.52]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2012 07:18:34 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:18:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2524595.q9KP7Ea2Q1@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.1 (Linux/3.2.0-31-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A6CBF8D@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <5056040.jAUIlqh764@helios> <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A6CBF8D@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-webserver][PATCH 0/6] Add meta-webserver X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:31:36 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 03 October 2012 14:08:16 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > > The answer is no, it doesn't. > > > > I guess on reflection we probably ought to be consistent here though - for > > better or worse, this is not what has been done when pulling in recipes > > from OE-Classic for the rest of meta-openembedded. The commit message > > does already list the changes from the original, and I'll concede that > > having just one revision doesn't give a huge amount in the way of insight > > on previous origin; ultimately as you say, OE-Classic is still there as a > > reference for that. > > > > OK, I've squashed those commits out on the branch. Would it be worth me > > posting a v2 after all these changes? > > Actually, this is one really annoying thing about OE. When people > rename the file 'git blame' comes worthless. Is there a way around > this? Usually it picks up on renames just fine, but as with git diff -M there is some fuzziness in how it determines the difference between a file rename and an unrelated delete followed by an add; sometimes the difference is too great for git to consider as a rename with its default settings. I just tested, you can improve rename detection with git blame by using the -C option though; adjusting the -M value might also help. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre