All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, TYOS@jp.ibm.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com,
	Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
	Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeep@us.ibm.com>,
	dwilder@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: fix compilation of when AltiVec is enabled
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 15:15:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2547699.pxo2WhrkVo@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0LBPkOUvac_keA6bGMHfU6PGfcpHOoUmpJFpSDsyU+O_Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

30/08/2018 13:58, Christian Ehrhardt:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:52 PM Takeshi T Yoshimura <TYOS@jp.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I could reproduce the issue you reported in 18.08 with my ppc64le box with
> > RedHat 7.5 and GCC4.8.
> > The patch resolved the issue in my environment. Thanks!
> 
> I added your test (tanks) and Adrien's extensive review/discussion as tags
> and also addressed a few checkpatch findings.
> V2 is up on the list now ...
> 
> > I am a bit newbie in dpdk-dev, but I will try contacting Chao and other
> > IBM guys... Sorry for our slow reply.
> 
> Thanks for your participation Takeshi,
> we at least now have had a few replies after Thomas used the superpowers of
> "CPT. CAPSLOCK" \o/.
> 
> I also have a call later today to make sure this is brought up inside IBM
> to make sure someone is maintaining it for real.

Summary of the situation:
	- I used caps lock on August 30th
	- We got replies on the ML in the next 2 days (Alfredo, Chao, Takeshi)
	- On September 3rd, Adrien raised a major issue for C++ with the fix v3
		http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-September/110733.html
	- Another email about a possible GCC fix on September 5th (David Wilder)
	- There was a private reply on September 27th, confirming an IBM support
	- and nothing else

Nobody at IBM requests to get a compilation fix for ppc64.
And there was no issue raised after 18.11-rc1 release.
I guess it means DPDK is not used on ppc64.
In this case, we should mark the ppc port as unmaintained for 18.11.

OR SHOULD I USE MY CAPS LOCK AGAIN?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 14:19 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-22 15:11 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-27 12:22   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-28 11:30     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-28 11:44       ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-28 12:38         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-28 15:02           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-29  8:27             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-29 13:16               ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-29 14:37                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30  8:36                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-08-30 11:22                     ` Alfredo Mendoza
2018-08-31  3:44                     ` Chao Zhu
2018-09-27 14:11                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30  9:48                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30 10:00                     ` [PATCH] ppc64: fix compilation of when AltiVec is enabled Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30 10:52                       ` Takeshi T Yoshimura
2018-08-30 11:58                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-05 14:15                           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-11-05 21:20                             ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2018-11-07 10:03                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 18:58                                 ` dwilder
2018-11-07 21:21                                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 23:53                                     ` Pradeep Satyanarayana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2547699.pxo2WhrkVo@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=TYOS@jp.ibm.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.