From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 0/3] implement pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:51:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25567965-4eb5-7557-db49-e17776cec3d4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221025132502.GA31530@test-zns>
On 10/25/22 14:25, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:34:04AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Add bio pcpu caching for normal / IRQ-driven I/O extending REQ_ALLOC_CACHE,
>> which was limited to iopoll.
>
> So below comment (stating process context as MUST) can also be removed as
> part of this series now?
Right, good point
> 495 * If REQ_ALLOC_CACHE is set, the final put of the bio MUST be done from process
> 496 * context, not hard/soft IRQ.
> 497 *
> 498 * Returns: Pointer to new bio on success, NULL on failure.
> 499 */
> 500 struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned short nr_vecs,
> 501 blk_opf_t opf, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> 502 struct bio_set *bs)
> 503 {
[...]
>> The next step will be turning it on for other users, hopefully by default.
>> The only restriction we currently have is that the allocations can't be
>> done from non-irq context and so needs auditing.
>
> Isn't allocation (of bio) happening in non-irq context already?
That's my assumption, true for most of them, but I need to actually
check that. Will be following up after this series is merged.
> Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
thanks
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20221021103627epcas5p34eaaf3c8161bbee33160cce8b58efd5f@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-10-21 10:34 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/3] implement pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-21 10:34 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/3] bio: split pcpu cache part of bio_put into a helper Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-21 10:34 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/3] block/bio: add pcpu caching for non-polling bio_put Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-21 10:34 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/3] io_uring/rw: enable bio caches for IRQ rw Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-25 13:25 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/3] implement pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O Kanchan Joshi
2022-10-25 14:51 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-10-25 19:42 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25567965-4eb5-7557-db49-e17776cec3d4@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.