From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Make drm support modular Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:41:34 +0200 Message-ID: <2568731.dqdEiMuDro@wuerfel> References: <1432905926-31606-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1432905926-31606-1-git-send-email-geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Thierry Reding , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Friday 29 May 2015 15:25:25 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Make drm support modular to reduce kernel size (-620 KiB): > > text data bss dec hex filename > 12211122 1392076 338520 13941718 d4bbd6 vmlinux.before > 11581470 1387196 338264 13306930 cb0c32 vmlinux.after > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > Slightly controversial: > - Does anyone need drm for boot testing? Only the tegra driver is affected, so let's ask the tegra maintainers. Arnd > > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > index 40ca1ab29a2e350f..9b4e33d5b15e340f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > @@ -426,15 +426,17 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_VSP1=m > # CONFIG_MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT is not set > CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7180=m > CONFIG_VIDEO_ML86V7667=m > -CONFIG_DRM=y > +CONFIG_TEGRA_HOST1X=y > +CONFIG_DRM=m > CONFIG_DRM_PTN3460=m > CONFIG_DRM_PS8622=m > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_FIMD=y > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI=y > CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=m > -CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=y > -CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y > +CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=m > +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=m > +CONFIG_FB=y > CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=y > CONFIG_FB_WM8505=y > CONFIG_FB_SH_MOBILE_LCDC=y > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:41:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Make drm support modular In-Reply-To: <1432905926-31606-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> References: <1432905926-31606-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> Message-ID: <2568731.dqdEiMuDro@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 29 May 2015 15:25:25 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Make drm support modular to reduce kernel size (-620 KiB): > > text data bss dec hex filename > 12211122 1392076 338520 13941718 d4bbd6 vmlinux.before > 11581470 1387196 338264 13306930 cb0c32 vmlinux.after > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > Slightly controversial: > - Does anyone need drm for boot testing? Only the tegra driver is affected, so let's ask the tegra maintainers. Arnd > > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > index 40ca1ab29a2e350f..9b4e33d5b15e340f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > @@ -426,15 +426,17 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_VSP1=m > # CONFIG_MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT is not set > CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7180=m > CONFIG_VIDEO_ML86V7667=m > -CONFIG_DRM=y > +CONFIG_TEGRA_HOST1X=y > +CONFIG_DRM=m > CONFIG_DRM_PTN3460=m > CONFIG_DRM_PS8622=m > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_FIMD=y > CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI=y > CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=m > -CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=y > -CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y > +CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=m > +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=m > +CONFIG_FB=y > CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=y > CONFIG_FB_WM8505=y > CONFIG_FB_SH_MOBILE_LCDC=y >