From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Brusowankin <skidancer@gmail.com>
Subject: Windows XP patches
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 22:03:59 -0400
Message-ID: <256a156105090719033ec9f0b7@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0767508416=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============0767508416==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_3464_21024315.1126145039757"

------=_Part_3464_21024315.1126145039757
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

This is my first post to this group. I am confused by what I have read in a=
n=20
early version of the FAQ and the current version. The first version said=20
that there was a licensing issue and the second version claims that Windows=
=20
does not lend itself to the paravirtualization techniques that Xen uses. Ha=
s=20
Xen changed that much? The reason I would like to know is that I do not wan=
t=20
to have to buy a new system in order to take be able to run Windows XP and=
=20
Linux or Darwin/Mac OSX together (yes I have begun to read the documentatio=
n=20
so that I can port Darwin to Xen). If the problem is the licensing, would=
=20
that still apply if I am a registered legal owner of an existing copy of=20
Windows XP and could just patch a few dll's?

Thanks,

David

------=_Part_3464_21024315.1126145039757
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,<br>
<br>
This is my first post to this group. I am confused by what I have read
in an early version of the FAQ and the current version. The first
version said that there was a licensing issue and the second version
claims that Windows does not lend itself to the paravirtualization
techniques that Xen uses. Has Xen changed that much? The reason I would
like to know is that I do not want to have to buy a new system in order
to take be able to run Windows XP and Linux or Darwin/Mac OSX together
(yes I have begun to read the documentation so that I can port Darwin
to Xen). If the problem is the licensing, would that still apply if I
am a registered legal owner of an existing copy of Windows XP and could
just patch a few dll's?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br>

------=_Part_3464_21024315.1126145039757--


--===============0767508416==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

--===============0767508416==--