All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@amd.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Coding Style for local variables
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:38:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2579488.yFuDdFVEAc@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <722d00ff8ec9497a92b831cfd13475d5@huawei.com>

10/06/2024 18:31, Konstantin Ananyev:
> Morten said:
> > The coding style guide says:
> > 
> > "Variables should be declared at the start of a block of code rather than in the middle. The exception to this is when the variable is
> > const in which case the declaration must be at the point of first use/assignment. Declaring variable inside a for loop is OK."
> > 
> > Since DPDK switched to C11, variables can be declared where they are used, which reduces the risk of using effectively uninitialized
> > variables. "Effectively uninitialized" means initialized to 0 or NULL where declared, to silence any compiler warnings about the use of
> > uninitialized variables.
> > 
> > Can we please agree to remove the recommendation/requirement to declare variables at the start of a block of code?
> 
> I know that modern C standards allow to define variable in the middle.
> But I am strongly opposed to allow that in DPDK coding style.
> Such practice makes code much harder to read and understand (at least for me).

Yes it is convenient to know that all variables are described
in a known place, just after function parameters.

There is also a consistency concern.

Old contributors like to be in a comfort zone,
	and we don't want to lose old contributors.
New contributors may be refrained by old rules,
	and we would like to get more new contributors.

So that's a tricky decision.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 15:10 Coding Style for local variables Morten Brørup
2024-06-10 16:11 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-06-10 16:31 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-06-20  0:38   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-06-20  7:53     ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-20  8:09       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-06-20  9:02         ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-20 14:45           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-11 15:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-06-11 15:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-17 14:38 ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2579488.yFuDdFVEAc@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.