All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	 Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
	Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sysctl changes for v6.11-rc1
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:05:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25decb62-201e-4202-9c3d-24eb2dfb7cce@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240717194620.mx7hbefl2pxd34rv@joelS2.panther.com>

On 2024-07-17 21:46:20+0000, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:13:24AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > > * Preparation patches for sysctl constification
> > > 
> > >     Constifying ctl_table structs prevents the modification of proc_handler
> > >     function pointers as they would reside in .rodata. The ctl_table arguments
> > >     in sysctl utility functions are const qualified in preparation for a future
> > >     treewide proc_handler argument constification commit.
> > 
> > And to add some additional context and expectation setting, the mechanical
> > treewide constification pull request is planned to be sent during this
> > merge window once the sysctl and net trees land. Thomas Weißschuh has
> > it at the ready. :)
> 
> Big fan of setting expectations :). thx for the comment.
> Do you (@kees/ @thomas) have any preference on how to send the treewide
> const patch? I have prepared wording for the pull request for when the
> time comes next week, but if any of you prefer to send it through
> another path different than sysctl, please let me know.

Sysctl sounds good to me.

Linus, if you are already interested in the upcoming patch and its
background:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240619-sysctl-const-handler-v2-1-e36d00707097@weissschuh.net/


Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-17 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240716141703eucas1p2f6ddaf91b7363dd893d37b9aa8987dc6@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-07-16 14:16 ` [GIT PULL] sysctl changes for v6.11-rc1 Joel Granados
2024-07-16 18:13   ` Kees Cook
2024-07-17 19:46     ` Joel Granados
2024-07-17 20:05       ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2024-07-17 22:15       ` Kees Cook
2024-07-16 21:43   ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-08-06 18:57   ` Solar Designer
2024-08-06 19:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-06 19:24     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-13 20:52     ` Joel Granados

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25decb62-201e-4202-9c3d-24eb2dfb7cce@t-8ch.de \
    --to=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.