From: Patrik Kluba <kpajko79@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PREEMPT_RCU on UP
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:10:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26080408.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
Hi!
Does the preemptible RCU implementation have better performance (lower
latency?) than the classic RCU implementation on embedded uniprocessor
systems? I can't find any information about this in Documentation/.
Regards,
Patrik Kluba
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PREEMPT_RCU-on-UP-tp26080408p26080408.html
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 16:10 Patrik Kluba [this message]
2009-10-30 22:45 ` PREEMPT_RCU on UP Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26080408.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=kpajko79@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.