From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD9DC67839 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2331520849 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2331520849 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726296AbeLKUOd (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:14:33 -0500 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:55250 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726208AbeLKUOc (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:14:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C51608A39E; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id G7zW2dHH_V5o; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA0B608A3BA; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hD4t7JaysBga; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from blindfold.localnet (213-47-184-186.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [213.47.184.186]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56018608A39E; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:29 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Weinberger To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: bp@suse.de, bp@alien8.de, Masahiro Yamada , mingo@redhat.com, LKML , x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, jdike@addtoit.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/build] x86/um/vdso: Drop implicit common-page-size linker flag Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:28 +0100 Message-ID: <26201549.d0hG7Wm4ip@blindfold> In-Reply-To: References: <20181206191231.192355-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20181211180547.GG25994@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018, 20:08:30 CET schrieb Nick Desaulniers: > > But in this particular case, DKIM is pretty good spam protection > > mechanism so enabling it is a good idea. > > Internal Gmail developers were able to help me verify that SPF was > setup correctly, but indeed there's no DKIM. This article has more > info: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en. Richard, I > don't know if that's a lot of work on your end, but other folks using > gmail might have the same issue repeatedly with receiving emails from > your domain otherwise. Running your own mailserver is already a PITA, so adding a little more pain does not count in much more. Thanks for talking to Gmail guys, I'll look into adding DKIM. Thanks, //richard