All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: bodnar42@bodnar42.dhs.org (Me), jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu (Jan Harkes),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:57:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26524.990547044@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E152DEZ-0001y7-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E152DEZ-0001y7-00@the-village.bc.nu>


alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
>  Why is your cross compiler outputting different symbols to a linux
> native  compiler ?

> If __linux__ is not defined by the cross compiler, then the cross
> compiler is broken. A cross compiler has the same environment as the
> native compiler for the target. The only stuff that should break (well
> should as in might) is  tools native built

> Or am I misunderstanding the report ?

Why use a cross compiler? With the obvious exception of UML, the Linux
kernel is not a Linux executable, so why should it need to be compiled with
a compiler which targets such? 

The kernel compiles quite happily with compilers which aren't targetted 
specifically at Linux -- the CODA compatibility cruft being the one 
exception. I often just comment out the CODA includes from <linux/fs.h> to 
get round the same problem.

--
dwmw2



  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-22 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-22  4:24 [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h Me
2001-05-22 13:18 ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 14:21   ` Me
2001-05-22 14:34     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:57       ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-05-22 16:22         ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:40       ` Ryan Cumming
2001-05-22 16:56         ` UML cross-platform build problems (was Re: [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h) Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 20:13           ` Jeff Dike
2001-05-22 18:06         ` [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h Alan Cox
2001-05-24 17:33         ` Thomas Dodd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26524.990547044@redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bodnar42@bodnar42.dhs.org \
    --cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.