All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peter@hurleysoftware.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] audit: add tty field to LOGIN event
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:13:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2689878.2iyKlAmhn2@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhToUtpq94C76Xa51fKZsz-S0JUiZd-kXV2Q_705xYsgQQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, April 21, 2016 09:29:57 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
> > 
> > Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> > replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
> > audit_log_set_loginuid().  Lock and bump the kref to protect it, adding
> > audit_put_tty() alias to decrement it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > V4: Add missing prototype for audit_put_tty() when audit syscall is not
> > 
> >     enabled (MIPS).
> > 
> > V3: Introduce audit_put_tty() alias to decrement kref.
> > 
> > V2: Use kref to protect tty signal struct while in use.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/linux/audit.h |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  kernel/audit.c        |   18 +++++-------------
> >  kernel/auditsc.c      |    8 ++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index b40ed5d..32cdafb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > 
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> >  #include <uapi/linux/audit.h>
> > 
> > +#include <linux/tty.h>
> > 
> >  #define AUDIT_INO_UNSET ((unsigned long)-1)
> >  #define AUDIT_DEV_UNSET ((dev_t)-1)
> > 
> > @@ -343,6 +344,23 @@ static inline unsigned int audit_get_sessionid(struct
> > task_struct *tsk)> 
> >         return tsk->sessionid;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > +static inline struct tty_struct *audit_get_tty(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +{
> > +       struct tty_struct *tty = NULL;
> > +       unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
> > +       if (tsk->signal)
> > +               tty = tty_kref_get(tsk->signal->tty);
> > +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
> > +       return tty;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void audit_put_tty(struct tty_struct *tty)
> > +{
> > +       tty_kref_put(tty);
> > +}
> 
> I'm generally not a big fan of defining functions as inlines in header
> files, with the general exception of dummy functions that will get
> compiled out.  Although I guess there might be some performance
> argument to be made wrt audit_log_task_info().
> 
> I guess I'm fine with this, but what was the idea behind the static
> inlines in audit.h?  Performance, or something else?

I think that is normal to prevent multiple definitions at link time.


> > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > index 195ffae..71e14d8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > @@ -1980,6 +1980,7 @@ static void audit_log_set_loginuid(kuid_t
> > koldloginuid, kuid_t kloginuid,> 
> >  {
> >  
> >         struct audit_buffer *ab;
> >         uid_t uid, oldloginuid, loginuid;
> > 
> > +       struct tty_struct *tty;
> > 
> >         if (!audit_enabled)
> >         
> >                 return;
> > 
> > @@ -1987,14 +1988,17 @@ static void audit_log_set_loginuid(kuid_t
> > koldloginuid, kuid_t kloginuid,> 
> >         uid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(current));
> >         oldloginuid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, koldloginuid);
> >         loginuid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, kloginuid),
> > 
> > +       tty = audit_get_tty(current);
> > 
> >         ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_LOGIN);
> >         if (!ab)
> >         
> >                 return;
> >         
> >         audit_log_format(ab, "pid=%d uid=%u", task_pid_nr(current), uid);
> >         audit_log_task_context(ab);
> > 
> > -       audit_log_format(ab, " old-auid=%u auid=%u old-ses=%u ses=%u
> > res=%d", -                        oldloginuid, loginuid, oldsessionid,
> > sessionid, !rc); +       audit_log_format(ab, " old-auid=%u auid=%u
> > tty=%s old-ses=%u ses=%u res=%d", +                        oldloginuid,
> > loginuid, tty ? tty_name(tty) : "(none)", +                       
> > oldsessionid, sessionid, !rc);
> > +       audit_put_tty(tty);
> > 
> >         audit_log_end(ab);
> >  
> >  }
> 
> Because we are still using the crappy fixed string format for
> kernel<->userspace communication, this patch will likely "break the
> world" ... let's check with Steve but I believe the way to handle this
> is to add the tty information to the end of the record.

The placement is OK. Thanks for asking.

-Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 18:14 [PATCH V4] audit: add tty field to LOGIN event Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-22  1:29 ` Paul Moore
2016-04-22  3:50   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-22  3:50     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-22 15:02     ` Paul Moore
2016-04-22 13:13   ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2016-04-22 17:16 ` Peter Hurley
2016-04-26 22:34   ` Paul Moore
2016-04-27  0:57     ` Peter Hurley
2016-04-28  1:31   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-28  1:31     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-28  3:05     ` Peter Hurley
2016-04-28 19:28       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-28 19:28         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-04-28 19:32         ` Peter Hurley
2016-04-28 20:07     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2689878.2iyKlAmhn2@x2 \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.