From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F0E13F42F; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714126041; cv=none; b=bPDaR2KrPh9jOih8/jlc1yziY/Y/dKAtSPRma/w6Gbrwk9vo4Aq4bi5uv9ITH9uIYHG3giFgLLNbfhar5wqkqklKbFpgqwSYvT13sdIpH/73rganw2gtNCqZ4EAcGQFjCPw6BTudncx2QPAz2VxI+3YLzSThkGGNLN6k6+2lMdM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714126041; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TFB+DqJ0O72/lmKUerSCxOZChv+hpSK+WLOY6t363cY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rGMQEA728vD4jplcCn7T3mD0pqBYk2lDM9xDN1SI/rH475H/o4iEplPzk6Ga+OOMyLKl0UnN514rSJCJnRT8JKFA6Xk72Xiw0TENsqWHy6gYwUTyzi+txBZSUO6Wkv4QAal9aY8q1qMHpz/Ysb0qXQtkyb+GJfNTRepK5IILfI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=V7O9TQ3c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="V7O9TQ3c" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1714126036; bh=TFB+DqJ0O72/lmKUerSCxOZChv+hpSK+WLOY6t363cY=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=V7O9TQ3cmcZnFAfFjm5p2s6Rq5l9GZrz2xXJSJdl+AqotqRkT2YFC/9UBaEvDTLK4 +xDBPXlCJvJzDnc+f10AfN1LKHS74sr4FkVB+g9QFoMKpFn3sFkVEABzmKex4AUrxa P/Wksn7d5iB+wWn30gXAMqyQt8xadg5OJg2iITF93jedHMPNmkDhPSWrRwnAlFevu0 bEttLU2IpvfuTb5p9042Rfy6QSgFKPrddseG9oR4SLk1yg/1Upk/DGT6x2Nc0CQP9w sT6ikfHlxNcSRf53enJNkA7C1kNvykISmtvI8bIIQOtnuVdREo+iEgDNo74Y2Qo2my hIbbgXYs2AlAw== Received: from [100.113.15.66] (ec2-34-240-57-77.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com [34.240.57.77]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: usama.anjum) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4ABA3780629; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <26993de8-0e4f-4d08-9009-730d674b16c7@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:43 +0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Use TAP interface in the set_memory_region test To: Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson References: <20240426085556.619731-1-thuth@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Muhammad Usama Anjum In-Reply-To: <20240426085556.619731-1-thuth@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/26/24 1:55 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > Use the kselftest_harness.h interface in this test to get TAP > output, so that it is easier for the user to see what the test > is doing. (Note: We are not using the KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST_SUITE() > macro here since these tests are creating their VMs with the > vm_create_barebones() function, not with vm_create_with_one_vcpu()) Thank you for the patch. I'm unable to apply the patch on next-20240426. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 86 +++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c > index bd57d991e27d..4db6a66a3001 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include "kselftest_harness.h" > > /* > * s390x needs at least 1MB alignment, and the x86_64 MOVE/DELETE tests need a > @@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ extern const uint64_t final_rip_end; > > static sem_t vcpu_ready; > > +int loops; > + > static inline uint64_t guest_spin_on_val(uint64_t spin_val) > { > uint64_t val; > @@ -219,6 +222,13 @@ static void test_move_memory_region(void) > kvm_vm_free(vm); > } > > +TEST(move_in_use_region) > +{ > + ksft_print_msg("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); > + for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++) > + test_move_memory_region(); > +} > + > static void guest_code_delete_memory_region(void) > { > uint64_t val; > @@ -308,12 +318,19 @@ static void test_delete_memory_region(void) > kvm_vm_free(vm); > } > > -static void test_zero_memory_regions(void) > +TEST(delete_in_use_region) > +{ > + ksft_print_msg("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); > + for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++) > + test_delete_memory_region(); > +} > + > +TEST(zero_memory_regions) > { > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > struct kvm_vm *vm; > > - pr_info("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n"); > + ksft_print_msg("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n"); > > vm = vm_create_barebones(); > vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); > @@ -326,7 +343,7 @@ static void test_zero_memory_regions(void) > } > #endif /* __x86_64__ */ > > -static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void) > +TEST(invalid_memory_region_flags) > { > uint32_t supported_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES; > const uint32_t v2_only_flags = KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD; > @@ -389,7 +406,7 @@ static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void) > * Test it can be added memory slots up to KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS, then any > * tentative to add further slots should fail. > */ > -static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void) > +TEST(add_max_memory_regions) > { > int ret; > struct kvm_vm *vm; > @@ -408,13 +425,13 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void) > max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); > TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 0, > "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 0"); > - pr_info("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots); > + ksft_print_msg("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots); > > vm = vm_create_barebones(); > > /* Check it can be added memory slots up to the maximum allowed */ > - pr_info("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n", > - (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10); > + ksft_print_msg("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n", > + (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10); > > mem = mmap(NULL, (size_t)max_mem_slots * MEM_REGION_SIZE + alignment, > PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > @@ -455,12 +472,21 @@ static void test_invalid_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, int memfd, > TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "%s", msg); > } > > -static void test_add_private_memory_region(void) > +static bool has_cap_guest_memfd(void) > +{ > + return kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) && > + (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)); > +} > + > +TEST(add_private_memory_region) > { > struct kvm_vm *vm, *vm2; > int memfd, i; > > - pr_info("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); > + if (!has_cap_guest_memfd()) > + SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM"); > + > + ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); > > vm = vm_create_barebones_protected_vm(); > > @@ -491,13 +517,16 @@ static void test_add_private_memory_region(void) > kvm_vm_free(vm); > } > > -static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void) > +TEST(add_overlapping_private_memory_regions) > { > struct kvm_vm *vm; > int memfd; > int r; > > - pr_info("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); > + if (!has_cap_guest_memfd()) > + SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM"); > + > + ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); > > vm = vm_create_barebones_protected_vm(); > > @@ -536,46 +565,15 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void) > close(memfd); > kvm_vm_free(vm); > } > + > #endif > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > -#ifdef __x86_64__ > - int i, loops; > - > - /* > - * FIXME: the zero-memslot test fails on aarch64 and s390x because > - * KVM_RUN fails with ENOEXEC or EFAULT. > - */ > - test_zero_memory_regions(); > -#endif > - > - test_invalid_memory_region_flags(); > - > - test_add_max_memory_regions(); > - > -#ifdef __x86_64__ > - if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) && > - (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))) { > - test_add_private_memory_region(); > - test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(); > - } else { > - pr_info("Skipping tests for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); > - } > - > if (argc > 1) > loops = atoi_positive("Number of iterations", argv[1]); > else > loops = 10; > > - pr_info("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); > - for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) > - test_move_memory_region(); > - > - pr_info("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); > - for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) > - test_delete_memory_region(); > -#endif > - > - return 0; > + return test_harness_run(argc, argv); > } -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum