Re: [PATCH V2] user-manual: add addition gitweb information

[Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@cox.net>]

On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 03:29:09 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
 > "Stephen P. Smith" <ischis2@cox.net> writes:
 > 
 > >  The gitweb cgi script provides users an easy way to browse your
 > > -project's files and history without having to install Git; see the file
 > > -gitweb/INSTALL in the Git source tree for instructions on setting it up.
 > > +project's revisions, file contents and logs without having to install
 > > +Git. Features like RSS/Atom feeds and blame/annotation details may
 > 
 > Thanks.  Was there a reason to rewrite "files and history" into
 > "revisions, file contents and logs"?  The words "revisions" and
 > "logs" both refer to the same thing and "history" is a good word for
 > it already, so I am puzzled.  No strong objection, though...
 > 

[Re-worded my explanation.]
 
"revisions, file contents and logs was in the second sentence of the first patch.
"files and history" was in the first sentence of the first patch.

When I was getting rid of the duplication I decided that "revisions, file contents 
and logs" was a little more explicit and so decided to keep that wording.

As a secondary reason that is the wording in gitweb.txt.