From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:32:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup In-Reply-To: <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> References: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> Message-ID: <2721722.1bE9GCKTjd@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:45:45 AM Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 03/15/2012 05:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov : > > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal > >> is > >> to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names. > >> This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly. > >> > >> One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated > >> sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc? > > > > I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc. > > Ok, good: I have "Acknowledgement" by several maintainers: so yes, I > will send this series via arm-soc. > > Is this means that I can add your "Acked-by"? Yes, please. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov Thanks. -- Dmitry From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759673Ab2CUQcW (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:32:22 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:44320 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754719Ab2CUQcU (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:32:20 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, mpm@selenic.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, vinod.koul@intel.com, a.zummo@towertech.it Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:32:12 -0700 Message-ID: <2721722.1bE9GCKTjd@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.1 (Linux/3.2.10-3.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> References: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:45:45 AM Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 03/15/2012 05:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov : > > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal > >> is > >> to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names. > >> This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly. > >> > >> One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated > >> sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc? > > > > I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc. > > Ok, good: I have "Acknowledgement" by several maintainers: so yes, I > will send this series via arm-soc. > > Is this means that I can add your "Acked-by"? Yes, please. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov Thanks. -- Dmitry