Re: vmwgfx: remove identical branches

[Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>]

----- Original Message -----
> Commit 8b7de6aa8468: "vmwgfx: Rework fence event action" removed the
> tv_sec & tv_usec arguments to vmw_event_fence_action_create, which meant
> that both sides of the if/else are now exactly the same.
> 
> Remove the flag check, and just do it unconditionally.
> 
> Spotted with Coverity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>

and thanks for the patch.

Cheers, Jakob.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> index 436b013b4231..a078e6bbaf0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> @@ -1124,16 +1124,10 @@ int vmw_fence_event_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> void *data,
>  
>  	BUG_ON(fence == NULL);
>  
> -	if (arg->flags & DRM_VMW_FE_FLAG_REQ_TIME)
> -		ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> -						    arg->flags,
> -						    arg->user_data,
> -						    true);
> -	else
> -		ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> -						    arg->flags,
> -						    arg->user_data,
> -						    true);
> +	ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> +					    arg->flags,
> +					    arg->user_data,
> +					    true);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
>  		if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
>