From: Alexander Mark Diewald <a.diewald@diewald-net.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI/osl: speedup grace period in acpi_os_map_cleanup
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 19:11:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2780156.jMhhTiCNtb@adiewi-e6420> (raw)
Applying the patch version 2, i.e. replacing synchronize_rcu() with
synchronize_rcu_exhibited in the method acpi_os_map_cleanup() causes a
regression in i2c-based touchscreen drivers such that they are not recognized.
See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94281.
Reverting this modification re-enables the recognition of touchscreens on Dell
Venue 11 pro devices at least.
If the initial patch from Konstantin Khlebnikov is applied, the touchscreen
still works (tested by myself). Hence, I vote for pulling the original patch
in, avoiding the regression while still solving the initial problem mentioned
on the list. The patch is attached to this mail, again.
-----------------------------------------------------
--- drivers/acpi/osl.c.orig 2015-08-02 18:55:35.902306862 +0200
+++ drivers/acpi/osl.c 2015-08-02 12:32:59.845090711 +0200
@@ -94,10 +94,13 @@
acpi_physical_address phys;
acpi_size size;
unsigned long refcount;
+ atomic_t active;
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
static LIST_HEAD(acpi_ioremaps);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_ioremap_lock);
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(acpi_ioremap_wq);
static void __init acpi_osi_setup_late(void);
@@ -290,17 +293,31 @@
return NULL;
}
-/* Must be called with 'acpi_ioremap_lock' or RCU read lock held. */
-static void __iomem *
-acpi_map_vaddr_lookup(acpi_physical_address phys, unsigned int size)
+static void __iomem *acpi_get_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,
+ acpi_size size, struct acpi_ioremap **pmap)
{
struct acpi_ioremap *map;
+ rcu_read_lock();
map = acpi_map_lookup(phys, size);
- if (map)
+ if (map && atomic_inc_not_zero(&map->active)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ *pmap = map;
return map->virt + (phys - map->phys);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- return NULL;
+ *pmap = NULL;
+ return acpi_os_ioremap(phys, size);
+}
+
+static void acpi_put_ioremap(void __iomem *virt, struct acpi_ioremap *map)
+{
+ if (map) {
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&map->active))
+ wake_up_all(&acpi_ioremap_wq);
+ } else
+ iounmap(virt);
}
void __iomem *acpi_os_get_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, unsigned int
size)
@@ -408,6 +425,7 @@
map->phys = pg_off;
map->size = pg_sz;
map->refcount = 1;
+ atomic_set(&map->active, 1);
list_add_tail_rcu(&map->list, &acpi_ioremaps);
@@ -433,9 +451,10 @@
static void acpi_os_map_cleanup(struct acpi_ioremap *map)
{
if (!map->refcount) {
- synchronize_rcu_exhibited();
+ atomic_dec(&map->active);
+ wait_event(acpi_ioremap_wq, !atomic_read(&map->active));
acpi_unmap(map->phys, map->virt);
- kfree(map);
+ kfree_rcu(map, rcu_head);
}
}
@@ -944,20 +963,14 @@
acpi_status
acpi_os_read_memory(acpi_physical_address phys_addr, u64 *value, u32 width)
{
+ struct acpi_ioremap *map;
void __iomem *virt_addr;
unsigned int size = width / 8;
- bool unmap = false;
u64 dummy;
- rcu_read_lock();
- virt_addr = acpi_map_vaddr_lookup(phys_addr, size);
- if (!virt_addr) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- virt_addr = acpi_os_ioremap(phys_addr, size);
- if (!virt_addr)
- return AE_BAD_ADDRESS;
- unmap = true;
- }
+ virt_addr = acpi_get_ioremap(phys_addr, size, &map);
+ if (!virt_addr)
+ return AE_BAD_ADDRESS;
if (!value)
value = &dummy;
@@ -979,10 +992,7 @@
BUG();
}
- if (unmap)
- iounmap(virt_addr);
- else
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ acpi_put_ioremap(virt_addr, map);
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -1003,19 +1013,13 @@
acpi_status
acpi_os_write_memory(acpi_physical_address phys_addr, u64 value, u32 width)
{
+ struct acpi_ioremap *map;
void __iomem *virt_addr;
unsigned int size = width / 8;
- bool unmap = false;
- rcu_read_lock();
- virt_addr = acpi_map_vaddr_lookup(phys_addr, size);
- if (!virt_addr) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- virt_addr = acpi_os_ioremap(phys_addr, size);
- if (!virt_addr)
- return AE_BAD_ADDRESS;
- unmap = true;
- }
+ virt_addr = acpi_get_ioremap(phys_addr, size, &map);
+ if (!virt_addr)
+ return AE_BAD_ADDRESS;
switch (width) {
case 8:
@@ -1034,10 +1038,7 @@
BUG();
}
- if (unmap)
- iounmap(virt_addr);
- else
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ acpi_put_ioremap(virt_addr, map);
return AE_OK;
}
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-02 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-02 17:11 Alexander Mark Diewald [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-04 17:29 [PATCH v2] ACPI/osl: speedup grace period in acpi_os_map_cleanup Alex Garnett
2015-11-05 2:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-08 8:47 [PATCH] " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-11-09 9:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-11-09 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-14 22:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-14 15:52 ` joeyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2780156.jMhhTiCNtb@adiewi-e6420 \
--to=a.diewald@diewald-net.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.