RE: [PATCH] omap2+: mux: Initialise the static pads.

[Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>]

Hi Tony,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@atomide.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:13 PM
>To: Sricharan R
>Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Benoit Cousson; paul@pswan.com; Santosh
>Shilimkar
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap2+: mux: Initialise the static pads.
>
>* Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com> [110304 09:31]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> >Hmm it's there as commit 93c5f165e10c21a3813a687204388a34072b2a62
>>
>> >in devel-mux branch. Can you please update your patch against
>>
>> >that commit so it's easier to see what your changes are?
>>
>> >
>>
>> >BTW, the patch you posted got trashed by your email client
>>
>> >or server..
>>
>> >
>>
>> Here is the updated patch on top of your previous patch.
>
>The patch formatting is still trashed, notice the double line
>spacing..
>

Very sorry about this.
Below is the link for the patch.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129947252016935&w=2

>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
>>
>> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info
*hmux,
>u8
>> state)
>
>..and the line wrapping of the patch lines.
>
>>
>> +     if ((state == _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED) && hmux->pads_dynamic
>>
>> +                             && hmux->enabled) {
>
>Yes I see that might allow removing the idle flag. Will give it
>a try with my testcase once you get your mail issue sorted out
>and can post a patch that applies.
>
Ok. I have checked this applies on top of the devel-mux branch.
>Tony
>

Thanks,
 Sricharan