From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-171.mta0.migadu.com (out-171.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A7A1401C for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 21:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749505820; cv=none; b=YLN+/idHnjsRUm89qhJsMjnuAqrsrrp+N0K3V8auZCO/fXqiZSMrQyNJ9U9fubqDDPzq7l8MnmOpMZauIxK2RYhHfrY+/Bge3kk8vkxFsVxTazNn/o8cduX828LYmP9SsVdU/OTDoG8GHS52O0oBxDXce+hAXAY2ftAF8qz9KWo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749505820; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IUTwAphWgJacqZzXuUcXpIQzKEy/zEhPJ1GKx2EbSas=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VaxCR+jPhefVPq2JJLDBEYxFZocTY2P9ld2NgUH254zUl9eZ9vCVScxQ1Ph72gFM3eSU94BdTs1daN5GG2Siz6VKoBkien5ODLDtq4uhi5t+Y81n3bNCLy3WdNJ5vsVxUdKCb2QUkZ7ObeAQxvR6jH7U/P8FMyI5OInVfN64p84= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=DAhiRgCe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="DAhiRgCe" Message-ID: <27e23bda-eaf9-4fb2-991c-71dbb3ee9f4c@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1749505804; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gf07GSMj+WxyCGAFqt8qw1Fl21dEj2hZCLfaOZpV9+0=; b=DAhiRgCeabofWEy2yg3Wo3UFkN2Jg/rSYJJCoSHNSlgMsXnw61w8DeQN0rRI4uweOhhmXu Y+jd8SqXPB1E+DxtgC+470/gYEEmRkct9hIzRUh46gvRQDI3T9Phg061syixaoiIu8yVWp oAy0HLQIt+BZXis+RyunJ0R4jnZ1C0c= Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:49:58 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: BPF CI update: veristat-scx job To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Team , kernel-ci@meta.com, Alexei Starovoitov , tj@kernel.org, mkutsevol@meta.com, scottbpc@meta.com, jakehillion@meta.com, mykolal@meta.com References: Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Ihor Solodrai In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 6/9/25 2:43 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 2:30 PM Ihor Solodrai wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> See an example of successful job run here: >> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/15543439297/job/43761685117 > > Unsuccessful veristat runs are actually more interesting :) Do you > have a link to some examples with veristat failures? Here is a recent one (although it's not that interesting either): https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/15496531493/job/43634843627 > >> >> [1] https://github.com/sched-ext/scx >> [2] https://github.com/libbpf/veristat >>