All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: "Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>,
	seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, yangge1116@126.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: drop FOLL_LONGTERM for encrypted region registration
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 16:58:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27ebe8f0-78b6-402a-a2e7-4e807251d20a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bd89e95-9c15-4a3a-916d-0d71a92d8b02@amd.com>

On 7/7/26 15:45, Gupta, Pankaj wrote:
> 
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Yes, it fails in this path but for file backed mapping, vma_is_fsdax() returns
>>> false because
>>>
>>> vma_is_dax() returns false:
>> Ah, okay, so fsdax is not involved and we really only fail because of the
>> writable_file_mapping_allowed() check.
>>
>> I was for a second thinking in terms of nested virt :)
>>
>>> Host side backend is regular file backed memory (no fsdax).
>> Okay, so we'll end up mapping an ordinary file into VM memory, and expose that
>> to the VM as part of virtio-pmem device.
>>
>> That also means that vfio etc. won't be able to longterm-pin such device memory.
>> So this is not a problem isolated to SEV.
>>
>> Forbidding to longterm pin is actually the right thing to do if the filesystem
>> relies on writenotify, as spelled out by Lorenzo's commit:
>>
>> "
>>      Writing to file-backed mappings which require folio dirty tracking using
>>      GUP is a fundamentally broken operation, as kernel write access to GUP
>>      mappings do not adhere to the semantics expected by a file system.
>>
>>      A GUP caller uses the direct mapping to access the folio, which does not
>>      cause write notify to trigger, nor does it enforce that the caller marks
>>      the folio dirty.
>>
>>      The problem arises when, after an initial write to the folio, writeback
>>      results in the folio being cleaned and then the caller, via the GUP
>>      interface, writes to the folio again.
>> "
>>
>> Hmmm
> 
> Yes. For file based mapping we don't allow long term pinning.
> 
> If we take into account the fragmentation concerns for MIGRATE_CMA and
> ZONE_MOVABLE allocations
> 
> solvable with FOLL_LONGTERM, I can think of two options(tested) to allow file
> based mappings as well:
> 
> 1. Fallback on FOLL_WRITE when FOLL_LONGTERM fails as suggested by Sean.

That is just not acceptable, as it breaks random other stuff (MIGRATE_CMA, as
one example) besides the file-pinning problems that Lorenzo added.

If we're going to hack something in, then that we bypass the file writeback check.
Not that we don't use FOLL_LONGTERM.

I'd hate to use a GUP flag to indicate "this is a legacy hack", but it clearly isolates the
issue (needs a better name obviously):


diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index ae9bca4eda5ca..e2c531f914d44 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1912,6 +1912,9 @@ enum {
         */
        FOLL_HONOR_NUMA_FAULT = 1 << 12,
 
+       /* TODO */
+       FOLL_LONGTERM = 1 << 13,
+
        /* See also internal only FOLL flags in mm/internal.h */
 };
 
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 0692119b79043..1fa0aa0cdc99d 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1186,8 +1186,8 @@ static bool writable_file_mapping_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
         * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
         * pin is the most egregious case so this is the case we disallow.
         */
-       if ((gup_flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM)) !=
-           (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM))
+       if ((gup_flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_LONGTERM_HACK)) !=
+           (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_LONGTERM_HACK))
                return true;
 
        /*
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static bool gup_fast_folio_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
         * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
         * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow.
         */
-       if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) ==
+       if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM_HACK)) ==
            (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE))
                reject_file_backed = true;
 
@@ -3180,7 +3180,7 @@ static int gup_fast_fallback(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
        int locked = 0;
        int ret;
 
-       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & ~(FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM |
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & ~(FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_LONGTERM_HACK |
                                       FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_PIN | FOLL_GET |
                                       FOLL_FAST_ONLY | FOLL_NOFAULT |
                                       FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA | FOLL_HONOR_NUMA_FAULT)))


-- 
Cheers,

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 14:45 [PATCH] KVM: SEV: drop FOLL_LONGTERM for encrypted region registration Pankaj Gupta
2026-07-01 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 16:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-01 16:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-01 16:39     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-01 16:56       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06 12:03   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-07-07 10:04     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-07 13:45       ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-07-07 13:59         ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 14:58         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27ebe8f0-78b6-402a-a2e7-4e807251d20a@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangge1116@126.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.