From: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>
To: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: fsession support
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 14:59:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2815019.mvXUDI8C0e@7940hx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107064352.291069-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
On 2026/1/7 14:43 Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> write:
> Hi, all.
>
> No changes in this version, just a rebase to deal with conflicts.
Ah, this message is not correct. Pls see the change log part for
the changes of this version, which is:
Changes since v6:
* change the prototype of bpf_session_cookie() and bpf_session_is_return(),
and reuse them instead of introduce new kfunc for fsession.
>
> overall
> -------
> Sometimes, we need to hook both the entry and exit of a function with
> TRACING. Therefore, we need define a FENTRY and a FEXIT for the target
> function, which is not convenient.
>
> Therefore, we add a tracing session support for TRACING. Generally
> speaking, it's similar to kprobe session, which can hook both the entry
> and exit of a function with a single BPF program.
>
> We allow the usage of bpf_get_func_ret() to get the return value in the
> fentry of the tracing session, as it will always get "0", which is safe
> enough and is OK.
>
> Session cookie is also supported with the kfunc bpf_session_cookie().
> In order to limit the stack usage, we limit the maximum number of cookies
> to 4.
>
> kfunc design
> ------------
> In order to keep consistency with existing kfunc, we don't introduce new
> kfunc for fsession. Instead, we reuse the existing kfunc
> bpf_session_cookie() and bpf_session_is_return().
>
> The prototype of bpf_session_cookie() and bpf_session_is_return() don't
> satisfy our needs, so we change their prototype by adding the argument
> "void *ctx" to them.
>
> We introduce the function bpf_fsession_is_return() and
> bpf_fsession_cookie(), and change the calling to bpf_session_cookie() and
> bpf_session_is_return() to them in verifier for fsession.
>
> architecture
> ------------
> The fsession stuff is arch related, so the -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned if
> it is not supported yet by the arch. In this series, we only support
> x86_64. And later, other arch will be implemented.
>
> Changes since v6:
> * change the prototype of bpf_session_cookie() and bpf_session_is_return(),
> and reuse them instead of introduce new kfunc for fsession.
>
> Changes since v5:
> * No changes in this version, just a rebase to deal with conflicts.
>
> Changes since v4:
> * use fsession terminology consistently in all patches
> * 1st patch:
> - use more explicit way in __bpf_trampoline_link_prog()
> * 4th patch:
> - remove "cookie_cnt" in struct bpf_trampoline
> * 6th patch:
> - rename nr_regs to func_md
> - define cookie_off in a new line
> * 7th patch:
> - remove the handling of BPF_TRACE_SESSION in legacy fallback path for
> BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN
>
> Changes since v3:
> * instead of adding a new hlist to progs_hlist in trampoline, add the bpf
> program to both the fentry hlist and the fexit hlist.
> * introduce the 2nd patch to reuse the nr_args field in the stack to
> store all the information we need(except the session cookies).
> * limit the maximum number of cookies to 4.
> * remove the logic to skip fexit if the fentry return non-zero.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * squeeze some patches:
> - the 2 patches for the kfunc bpf_tracing_is_exit() and
> bpf_fsession_cookie() are merged into the second patch.
> - the testcases for fsession are also squeezed.
>
> * fix the CI error by move the testcase for bpf_get_func_ip to
> fsession_test.c
>
> Changes since v1:
> * session cookie support.
> In this version, session cookie is implemented, and the kfunc
> bpf_fsession_cookie() is added.
>
> * restructure the layout of the stack.
> In this version, the session stuff that stored in the stack is changed,
> and we locate them after the return value to not break
> bpf_get_func_ip().
>
> * testcase enhancement.
> Some nits in the testcase that suggested by Jiri is fixed. Meanwhile,
> the testcase for get_func_ip and session cookie is added too.
>
> Menglong Dong (11):
> bpf: add fsession support
> bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline
> bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return}
> bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_is_return
> bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie
> bpf,x86: introduce emit_st_r0_imm64() for trampoline
> bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64
> libbpf: add fsession support
> selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession
> selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie
> selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 48 ++++-
> include/linux/bpf.h | 40 ++++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 18 +-
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 53 ++++-
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 79 +++++--
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 50 +++--
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 1 +
> net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 1 +
> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 1 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 1 +
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 4 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c | 115 ++++++++++
> .../bpf/prog_tests/tracing_failure.c | 2 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 +-
> .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c | 4 +-
> .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 +-
> .../progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 8 +-
> 22 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 6:43 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 7:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:50 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return} Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_is_return Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 7:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:45 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf,x86: introduce emit_st_r0_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 7:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:55 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:59 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2815019.mvXUDI8C0e@7940hx \
--to=menglong.dong@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.