From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: Another article abour Reiser4 on linux.com
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:17:22 +0200
Message-ID: <28295017.20060805181722@wp.pl>
References: <87bqqzbaug.fsf@baldur.nicundtas.de> <44D4B154.6010005@slaphack.com>
Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29490-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <44D4B154.6010005@slaphack.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello David,

Saturday, August 5, 2006, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote:
> We should really find something better to call them than "plugins", or
> we should come up with a standard copy'n'paste statement to refute this.
I agree. As Andrew Morton said:

"The plugins appear to be wildly misnamed - they're just an internal
abstraction layer which permits later feature additions to be added in a
clean and safe manner.  Certainly not worth all this fuss."

So we're talking about extensibility. How about we call it
'extensions' ?

-- 
Best regards,
Maciej