From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: What still uses the block layer? Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <283583.99423.qm@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <200710150151.31080.rob@landley.net> Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.66]:49042 "HELO web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750926AbXJOIhe (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:37:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710150151.31080.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Landley Cc: James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Suparna Bhattacharya , Nick Piggin --- Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 14 October 2007 7:45:46 pm Luben Tuikov wrote: > > Matthew's expletive and extremely rude response really shows > > the general attitude of the linux-scsi people. > > No, it doesn't. James Bottomley has been exceedingly polite and helpful, as > were several other people on the linux-scsi list when I asked them about this > stuff back in August. I wasn't referring to him specifically. He also stepped into the WWN thread in the same manner as he did in your thread. > Religion, politics, and anything remotely related to hotplug appear to be > topics to avoid in polite company if you want it to remain polite. (My > gripes with scsi mostly have to do with device enumeration. My attempts to > use sysfs also have to do with device enumeration. I've spotted a trend > here.) > > Rob > -- > "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." > - Ken Thompson. >