From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] doc: announce ABI change for filtering support Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:55:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2837192.XpzTdfrod8@xps13> References: <20151215084048.GA26906@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Felix Marti , Nirranjan Kirubaharan , Kumar Sanghvi To: Rahul Lakkireddy Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA45B62 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:56:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n186so154432890wmn.1 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:56:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151215084048.GA26906@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-15 14:10, Rahul Lakkireddy: > Hi Thomas, > > I am preparing a v2 of this series where I will be accomodating some > more fields to be considered for filtering. However, if the overall > approach seems ok to everyone then, should I submit a separate patch > for this ABI change announcement ? Yes, if this announce is not enough: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=648e6b3815a35