From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gy6l3-0005q3-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:17:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gy6l2-0005nT-Sh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:17:49 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gy6l2-0005n7-DH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:17:48 -0500 Received: from [70.168.83.78] (helo=centrmmtao06.cox.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gy6l2-0002JH-2x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:17:48 -0500 Message-ID: <28670974.1166879867726.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml07.mgt.cox.net> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 8:17:47 -0500 From: Ben Taylor Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] patch for supporting SMB on Solaris host MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: sol10x86@cox.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lennert Buytenhek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook ---- Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:40:27PM -0500, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > - snprintf(smb_cmdline, sizeof(smb_cmdline), "/usr/sbin/smbd -s %s", > > - smb_conf); > > + snprintf(smb_cmdline, sizeof(smb_cmdline), "% -s %s", > > + SMBD_BINARY, smb_conf); > > Doesn't look right to me? (s/%/%s/) Good catch. otherwise, the patch is better? Ben