All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: SELinux policy reload cannot be sent to audit system
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:23:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2867240.eZb4Ly0uub@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56391D9F.3080301@debian.org>

On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 09:48:31 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 03/11/15 21:08, Richard Guy Briggs a écrit :
> > On 15/11/03, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 06:12:07 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >>> I'm running in permissive mode.
> >>> 
> >>> I'm seeing a netlink open to the audit:
> >>> 
> >>> dbus-daem 1057 messagebus    7u  netlink 0t0  15248 AUDIT
> >>> 
> >>> Apparently audit_send() returns -1
> >> 
> >> Since its -1, that would be an EPERM. No idea where this is coming from
> >> if you have CAP_AUDIT_WRITE. I use pscap to check that.
> > 
> > Are you in a container of any kind or any non-init USER namespace?  I
> > can't see it being denied otherwise assuming it is only trying to send
> > AUDIT_USER_* class messages.  (This assumes upstream kernel.)
> 
> No, I initially saw this on my laptop and then tested on F23 in kvm.

I tested this on Fedora 22 and did not get a USER_AVC from dbus, but I also 
did not get an error message in syslog. So, I don't know what to make of it. 
(And for the record, I have a bz open saying that USER_AVC is the wrong event 
type. They are blaming libselinux but I blame them for not using 
AUDIT_USER_MAC_POLICY_LOAD.)

-Steve

> > I guess I have to ask which kernel too, since changes to NET and PID
> > namespaces are somewhat recent and Debian tends on the side of
> > conservative to be stable.
> 
> I'm under debian unstable and the kernel I'm running is 4.2
> 
> >>> I've been to reproduce this on F23 as well.
> >> 
> >> I have not played around with that yet.
> > 
> > What kernel is that?
> 
> 4.2 too apparently.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Laurent Bigonville
> 
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-03 16:05 SELinux policy reload cannot be sent to audit system Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-03 16:28 ` Steve Grubb
2015-11-03 16:38   ` Paul Moore
2015-11-03 17:12   ` Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-03 19:33     ` Steve Grubb
2015-11-03 20:08       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-11-03 20:48         ` Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-05  3:23           ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2015-11-05  8:32             ` Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-05  9:26               ` Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-05 13:20                 ` Steve Grubb
2015-11-05 23:03               ` Steve Grubb
2015-11-05 23:19                 ` Laurent Bigonville
2015-11-06  1:25                   ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2867240.eZb4Ly0uub@x2 \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.