All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Remove dead variable
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:22:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2869131.K5Z6hvSGBl@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59E50473.7040609@iogearbox.net>

Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017, 21:11:47 CEST schrieb Daniel Borkmann: 
> > I can squash it into 1/3, I kept it that way because
> > even without 1/3 this variable is unused.
> 
> Hmm, the helper looks like the below. In patch 1/3 you removed
> the 'if (unlikely(!task))' test where the variable was used before,
> so 2/3 without the 1/3 would result in a compile error.

Why a compile error? It emits a warning.

> BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_uid_gid)
> {
> 	struct task_struct *task = current;
> 	kuid_t uid;
> 	kgid_t gid;
> 
> 	if (unlikely(!task))
> 		return -EINVAL;

Well, this is the only "user". Okay.

> 	current_uid_gid(&uid, &gid);

Here we use current. So, task was always in vain.

So, I can happily squash 2/3 into 1/3 and resent.
The series just represented the way I've worked on the code... 

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-16 18:18 [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Don't check for current being NULL Richard Weinberger
2017-10-16 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Remove dead variable Richard Weinberger
2017-10-16 18:54   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-16 18:59     ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-16 19:11       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-16 19:22         ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2017-10-16 20:48           ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-16 18:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] bpf: Make sure that ->comm does not change under us Richard Weinberger
2017-10-16 20:50   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-16 20:55     ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-16 21:02       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-16 21:10         ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2869131.K5Z6hvSGBl@blindfold \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.