From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, Mario.Limonciello@amd.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Ray.Huang@amd.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com, Borislav.Petkov@amd.com,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Xinmei.Huang@amd.com,
Xiaojian.Du@amd.com, Li.Meng@amd.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: remove legacy set_boost callback for passive mode
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 11:10:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2887380.mvXUDI8C0e@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb14f6e7748f1b872f68eb2549d4e6033f0facbc.1707297581.git.perry.yuan@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1648 bytes --]
Hello.
On středa 7. února 2024 10:21:57 CET Perry Yuan wrote:
> With new freqency boost interface supported, legacy boost control
> doesn't make sense any more which only support passive mode.
> so it can remove the legacy set_boost interface from amd-pstate driver
> in case of there is conflict with new boost control logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 1 -
> include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 35791efc6e88..1dd523db3871 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -1675,7 +1675,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = {
> .exit = amd_pstate_cpu_exit,
> .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend,
> .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume,
> - .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost,
> .update_limits = amd_pstate_update_limits,
> .name = "amd-pstate",
> .attr = amd_pstate_attr,
> diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> index 465e9295a60c..ab7ca26974da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct amd_cpudata {
> struct amd_aperf_mperf prev;
>
> u64 freq;
> - bool boost_supported;
As a result of this removal the kernel-doc for this struct should be amended too because even after this patch is applied the `boost_supported` field remains documented.
> bool hw_prefcore;
>
> /* EPP feature related attributes*/
>
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 9:21 [PATCH v3 0/7] AMD Pstate Driver Core Performance Boost Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize new core precision boost state Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 14:45 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2024-02-07 15:10 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2024-02-08 4:19 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: implement cpb_boost sysfs entry for boost control Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix max_perf calculation for amd_get_max_freq() Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the MSR highest perf will be reset issue while cpb boost off Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: introduce the new cpu boost control method Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: remove legacy set_boost callback for passive mode Perry Yuan
2024-02-07 10:10 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2024-02-07 13:17 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-02-07 13:27 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2024-02-07 13:35 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-02-07 9:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: support new cpb boost control interface Perry Yuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2887380.mvXUDI8C0e@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
--cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
--cc=Xinmei.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.