[PATCH 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: don't detach devices without an IOMMU during teardown

[laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)]

Hi Will,

Thank you for the patch.

On Monday 12 January 2015 17:23:33 Will Deacon wrote:
> When tearing down the DMA ops for a device via of_dma_deconfigure, we
> unconditionally detach the device from its IOMMU domain. For devices
> that aren't actually behind an IOMMU, this produces a "Not attached"
> warning message on the console.
> 
> This patch changes the teardown code so that we don't detach from the
> IOMMU domain when there isn't an IOMMU dma mapping to start with.
> 
> Repoerted-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

I might have reported the problem, but I haven't repoerted it :-)

> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 7864797609b3..711c3d2802fb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2023,7 +2023,10 @@ static bool arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(struct device
> *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> 
>  static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = dev->archdata.mapping;
> +	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev);

As the function is already protected by an #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU is 
there a specific reason for this change ?

> +
> +	if (!mapping)
> +		return;
> 
>  	arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
>  	arm_iommu_release_mapping(mapping);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart